Archive for the ‘trends’ Category

Twitter Conversation - 10 Reasons

March 5th, 2009 by Jerell | 1 Comment | Filed in Tip of the Day, trends

Lately there has been a trend of some really big people on twitter engaging in massive unfollowings. For me I don’t agree with this as I really believe that the golden rule of Twitter is that you have to engage in the conversation.  This means that in my opinion it is a good idea to more or less have the same ratio of following to followers. My reasons are simple and I want to share them, but as always you should use Twitter as it best fits your needs, how you want to use Twitter, and not how someone should tell you to.

1.    You can’t engage in a conversation if you don’t follow people

2.    I don’t want to hear just myself speak

3.    I can learn more from others

4.    There are a lot more people interesting than me

5.    I’m not an expert in everything

6.    I’m not some self proclaimed Social Media Expert

7.    I’m not into pumping my EGO – (I’m not talking EGO in the Rand sense) but in the modern negative connotations

8.    You have a larger group of friends that you can talk to

9.    You have more opportunities to engage in the conversation

10. It opens up new opportunities and networking results.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: ,

Why Apple doesn’t get Twitter

February 5th, 2009 by Jerell | 7 Comments | Filed in Grade, Social Networking, Twitter, apple, trends

Although behavioral norms on Twitter and social networking are in their infancy, there still are some clear trends that are emerging. One of these I have been defining as the golden rule of social networking:

“social networking means:

you have to be social”

What this simply describes is that you have to be part of the conversation, and not just an observer or doing all the talking. Until about 6 months ago on Twitter the vast majority of users simply wanted their voice to be heard, and didn’t give much credence to how often they heard others voices, or even engaged in a conversation. Although they didn’t openly discuss it, we can infer that their goal was simply that to brag about, “look how many people are following me”. The example of this is the person/company is how they have 30 people that they are following, yet they have some 10,000+ who follow them. They often simply push links, press release updates or just want to hear themselves talk. Boring. Thank goodness this era for the most part has ended, and we are now in a trend of people understanding that conversation takes two or more people. In fact I believe that the trend will continue to evolve and it will become the norm to follow more people than follow you. Imagine that, a trend encouraging conversation and listening to more people. Sing Kum-Bi-Ya with me now.

Then yesterday I say a report on Twitter that said “”Apple brands top “social media index”".  As I looked into it, the summary was from a report by vitrue.com on ‘The Vitrue 100 - Top Social Brands of 2008′

My first response was that this has got to be a joke. Why? Apple isn’t part of the conversation. Yes they make some great products, and arguably the very best tools that enable many of us to be sociably mobile. But simply put:

Apple is not part of the conversation,
heck Apple doesn’t even listen to Steve Jobs
That’s right they follow no one, nada, 0.  They simply fail in social interaction. How do I further know this? When I look up the analytics on @apple @appleinc you wind the following from twitterholic and twitter-friends

twittertruth appleinc twitterholic

and 

 

appleinc twittertruth

 Apple simply doesn’t engage in conversation. Everyone talks about Apple and all of Apple’s products, but Apple doesn’t talk to others.

appleinc twittertruth twitter

 

So I looked and asked everywhere on Twitter to find out if an official Apple support account exists. However at the time of this story I can’t find one, if it’s there, it’s hidden. A hidden account is basically the same as a not having a support account at all. A pretty sad act for the company that creates many of the tools used, and the beloved iPhone. Yes I know how the Apple lovers are saying that their Apple product doesn’t break like a PC, Apples are plug and play, Apples are… etc, and because of Apples quality, Apple doesn’t need customer support, etc.

However my commentary isn’t about Apples products, but about how in today’s world customer support by a major company IS expected on Twitter, and how a company like Apple that makes the vast majority of tools used for social networking, doesn’t do social networking itself.

My recommendation to Apple, get your accounts up to speed before you get even remotely close to being Motrined. Word and conversation analytics can’t do the same job as having a real person interfacing with your customers.  Apple you need to engage in a conversation with your customers. …its this or hire back Guy Kawasaki as your CEO since he gets social media.

It’s not that hard to engage and converse with your customers: Step 1, talk to us, and preferably without the twittering press releases.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , ,

Validating Your Social Network Connections

December 9th, 2008 by Jerell | 5 Comments | Filed in Social Networking, Twitter, trends
As social networking gains in popularity how do you know that the person you just connected with is not psychotic, a stalker, or worse? Well the sad truth is that just like in your non digital networking life, you can never know for 100% absolute certain at first. However there are some simple steps that you can take to discover if your new connection has legitimate networking intentions or not. Some simple research also provides you with the knowledge to weed out those that do not meet a truthfulness comfort level because there are four simple social networking behavior norms that are beginning to appear.
  1. A REAL PHOTO ~ If you don’t have a photo up it is perceived that you are hiding something. Also permanent avatars don’t count here either. Nor photos of your favorite cat, dog, car, logo or vacation. I understand that they can all look really cool, but they don’t show you the person, and it is you the person who I want to connect with. A real photo bridges the social connection to those you converse with online.
  2. A RELEVANT LINK ~ How can I learn more about you if you don’t provide something other than your twitter profile, corporate website, Multi Level Marketing video, or even a myspace account for Guns and Roses? Once again the expected norm is to provide a valuable link to your company, to your blog, or other aspects that let me know that you are a ‘normal’ person and you have some degree of social skills and sense of community. Think about it this way, 80% of the time when you first meet a person, what do they ask? Easy, ‘What do you do for a living?” Your relevant link should answer this question. As in “I work for…”or “My company is…”, and it should not be of the “I was convicted of…”.
  3. REAL LIFE CONNECTIONS ~ If you say that you live in Denver, but all your connections are not from Denver, it raises a flag. Do you also have local friends on social networks? Can you tweet them and have them respond with a “Sure, I’ve known Jerell for 6 years at IBM, and he is a great guy”. Or would all of their connections respond with “I only know him from online”.
  4. CONVERSATION ~ This one is easy, do they engage in conversation or only put out their MLM links, comments, or quotes? Then there are those that attempt to engage in conversation, but instead of asking meaningful questions it’s a ploy to get you to buy what they are selling 100% of the time. Yes, social networking is a valuable tool for a businesses efforts in new media , but it shouldn’t be a part of every update or comment you make.

What are your rules or any norms that I missed?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , ,